Bishop Update | Prince Singh Nomination

People of Eastern and Western Michigan,

With excitement, we announce the nomination of the Rt. Rev. Prince G. Singh, Ph.D. to serve as Bishop Provisional of The Episcopal Dioceses of Eastern and Western Michigan.

For more on the background of the canons around the selection of a bishop provisional and our own interviewing and selection process, we invite you to read the announcement and update sent last week. 

Bishop Singh comes to us with energy and enthusiasm for the work we have to do together as dioceses. For his fourteen years as the bishop diocesan of the Diocese of Rochester, Bishop Singh’s tenure was marked by three core priorities: relational welcome, nurturing and growing the beloved community; servant leadership, empowering lay and clergy leaders for the work of the church; and spiritual stewardship, considering spiritual and material resources with an eye on sustainability, generosity, and invitation.

The Rt. Rev. Prince Singh offers a word of greeting to the
Dioceses of Eastern and Western Michigan. 

Watch on YouTube:  Eastern MichiganWestern Michigan
Watch on Facebook:  Eastern MichiganWestern Michigan

 

Bishop Singh, born and raised in India, received degrees from Madras Christian College and Union Biblical Seminary before his ordination in the Church of South India (Anglican Communion) in 1990. He served several congregations in rural South India before further study in practical theology at Union Theological Seminary in Virginia (1994), Princeton Seminary (1995), and Drew University, where he received a Ph.D. in Religion and Society (2005). Before his election in Rochester, Bishop Singh served two congregations in the Diocese of Newark. Bishop Singh’s churchwide leadership includes membership in Bishops United Against Gun Violence, the House of Bishops theology committee, as Co-Chair of the Task Force on Theology of Social Justice, and as a coach for the College for Bishops. He has also served on a number of boards, including the Board of Directors for Episcopal Senior Life, the Board of Trustees for Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School and Hobart William Smith Colleges, and on the Board of Episcopal Relief and Development. He announced his resignation from the Diocese of Rochester in September.

If elected during Saturday’s joint session of convention, Bishop Singh would begin his time with us sometime early in the new year following his departure from his current diocese. Joining our other shared staff members, Bishop Singh would serve both Eastern and Western Michigan on a full-time basis for a period of up to 3-5 years. He would relocate to Michigan during that time.

A series of Zoom Meet & Greets will take place between now and convention late this month. All in our dioceses are encouraged to attend and especially those delegates and clergy who will take part in the voting process. Please use the provided links to RSVP for your particular Meet and Greet with Bishop Singh. We invite you to share this invitation broadly within your congregations.

All information about the upcoming Diocesan Convention is available on the diocesan websites at eastmich.org/convention and edwm.org/convention. All business sessions, as well as other offerings, will be livestreamed to the diocesan Facebook pages.

Yours in Christ,

The Standing Committee of Eastern Michigan 

Janet Huff Worvie, President
St. John’s, Otter Lake

The Rev. Brian Chace, Vice Pres.
Ret., West Branch

Gary Grinn
St. Paul’s, Gladwin

Barb Ilkka, Secretary
St. John’s, Saginaw

The Rev. Deacon Anna Leigh Kubbe
Holy Family, Blue Water

The Rev. Nancy Mayhew
St. Alban’s, Bay City

The Standing Committee of Western Michigan 

The Rev. Dr. Randall R. Warren, Pr.
St. Luke’s, Kalamazoo

Martha Bartlett, Secretary
St. James, Pentwater

The Rev. Jodi Baron
St. Philip’s, Beulah & Holy Trinity, Manistee

David Croal
St. Mark’s, Coldwater

Anne Davidson
St. Mark’s, Coldwater

The Rev. BJ Heyboer, Vice Pres.
St. Mark’s, Newaygo

The Rev. Diane M. Pike
Southwest MI Episcopal Covenant

Carole Redwine
St. Philip’s, Grand Rapids

Bishop Update | Provisional Process

Dear Friends in Christ,

As we approach our diocesan convention later this month, we write with an update on the process of selecting a bishop provisional to serve alongside our people in Eastern and Western Michigan.

As was announced in August, a special interviewing committee composed of equal members of both dioceses met several times over the last couple of months to interview a slate of candidates. Having conducted these interviews, they recommended a candidate to the Joint Standing Committee, who enthusiastically accepted the recommendation. We are now in the process of conducting background checks and other necessary steps toward public nomination.

Consistent with the canons of The Episcopal Church, the candidate is an already-consecrated bishop currently serving in another diocese. The Standing Committee is charged with selecting and nominating one candidate to the convention.

If elected, our candidate for bishop provisional will be with us for 2-4 years, throughout the period of intentional relationship and exploration between our two dioceses, as we navigate the longterm effects of the pandemic and continue to heal from the suspension of our bishop over the last year. The role of bishop provisional is akin to priest-in-charge, holding all the responsibilities of a bishop diocesan but without tenure. As a seasoned bishop, they offer our dioceses rich experience in ministry and an outsider’s perspective as we tackle the big questions about who we are called to be in this place and time. They would be a shared staff member of the dioceses, joining our Canon for Evangelism and Director of Children, Youth, and Young Adult Ministries in serving our communities from shore to shore.

The candidate is in the process of announcing their departure within their current diocese. Recognizing that these goodbyes are pastorally sensitive, they have requested that we wait to release a full announcement about the candidate until mid-October. We are excited to share their name and information with you as soon as we are able.

After the nomination is announced and before the joint diocesan convention, there will be several opportunities for Zoom “meet and greets” with the bishop for our people to hear from and interact with our nominee ahead of convention.

Please RVSP using the links provided above to receive your secure Zoom link for the meeting. We invite you to share this invitation broadly within your congregation with the understanding that these gatherings are open to all. Delegates and clergy voting in the upcoming convention are especially encouraged to attend.

We ask your prayers for the candidate, for your Standing Committees, and for one another as we enter our next season of ministry together with unceasing hope, great humor, and expectant listening to the Spirit’s leading. We look forward to sharing more information soon and to see you on Zoom and in Lansing later this month!

Yours in Christ,
The Standing Committee of Eastern Michigan

Janet Huff Worvie, President
St. John’s, Otter Lake

The Rev. Brian Chace, Vice Pres.
Ret., West Branch

Gary Grinn
St. Paul’s, Gladwin

Barb Ilkka, Secretary
St. John’s, Saginaw

The Rev. Deacon Anna Leigh Kubbe
Holy Family, Blue Water

The Rev. Nancy Mayhew
St. Alban’s, Bay City
The Standing Committee of Western Michigan

The Rev. Dr. Randall R. Warren, Pr.
St. Luke’s, Kalamazoo

Martha Bartlett, Secretary
St. James, Pentwater

The Rev. Jodi Baron
St. Philip’s, Beulah & Holy Trinity, Manistee

David Croal
St. Mark’s, Coldwater

Anne Davidson
St. Mark’s, Coldwater

The Rev. BJ Heyboer, Vice Pres.
St. Mark’s, Newaygo

The Rev. Diane M. Pike
Southwest MI Episcopal Covenant

Carole Redwine
St. Philip’s, Grand Rapids

Feast Days with Bishop Skip | St. Michael and All Angels

St. John’s, Saginaw, Michigan: Saint Michael and All Angels
September 29, 2021

From Genesis: “Jacob awoke from his sleep and said, ‘Surely the Lord is in this place—and I did not know it!’ And he was afraid and said, ‘How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.’”

Not just here, but any place in which we find ourselves, can be the gate of heaven, a place where we become open to the possibility of recognizing the joining of heaven and earth. Allow me to tell you of one of the moments in my life where God reached through the portal, and left an indelible mark on my heart and soul.

I had the privilege back in the 1990’s to spend some time working with Mother Teresa in Calcutta, India. I was assigned to the Dying and Destitute home, Mother Teresa’s “first love” as she called it. It is there she wanted “no one to die without knowing God loves them and knowing a loving human touch.” There were about 100 beds. 50% of the people brought in from the streets would die there. The welcomed came in with leprosy, typhoid, tuberculosis, dysentery, cholera, AIDS. They needed to be de-liced and in some cases gangrenous tissue removed. Fresh clothes were put on them, covering the wounds of the street.

Coming in the door my first day I discovered a man in the first cot had died just minutes before my arrival. A nun came to me, took my hand and said, “We need you to wash clothes, bed sheets and blankets.” So I was taken to a large room with four brick tubs in a line cemented to the floor. Piles of clothes and linens were brought to us, soiled by incontinent people. Each tub had a purpose: the first revealed a local man bearing a long heavy stick to stir and loosen what was in the fabric; the second, my tub, was for pouring in disinfectant and scrubbing using the rough walls of the sides; the third held soapy water for more washing; the fourth was there for a hoped for clear rinse. All of it was taken to the roof to be spread out in the sun to dry.

As I stood over my station at the second tub, mostly in silence, I began to be drawn to a sense of the presence of God. A doorway a few feet behind me over had a sign over it which read, “This is the doorway to heaven.” It was the morgue. As I washed and scrubbed, feeling that telltale ache in my back from leaning over, bodies on a stretcher would, on occasion, be carried by.

Slowly, a transformation occurred. As I looked into that dark, smelly water, I saw the world. The clothes and bed sheets became sacraments—outward and visible signs of God’s people, dead and alive. In that scummy water I saw the pain, the victims, the injustice, the humiliation, the degradation, the betrayal. It was Golgotha, the Place of the Skull, in a washtub. Then, and I assure you I am not a person given to hearing things, out of somewhere even as I could not locate it, I heard, I heard!, alleluias being sung. The glorious reign of God breaking in!

And it continued to break in as I reached into the muck below the surface of the water. In my disinfectant tub I felt something in the corner of a blanket that had been folded over, a strategy used by the residents to save for later rice and bread they had been fed, fearful no more was to be provided. This time, however, I lifted something to the surface. Breaking through the meniscus to the light of day, in my hand was a cheap 25 cent plastic crucifix attached to the beads of a rosary. There was Christ on the Cross as a profound sense of peace came over me as I experienced being embraced fully and completely by the love of God. I was renewing my baptismal vows in the holy water stained by the hurt and pain of God’s people.

“Surely the Lord is in this place—and I did not know it.” I learned just last week from our Presiding Bishop that Jewish scholars, commenting on the story of Jacob at Bethel, note that when Jacob says, the word “I,” in the Hebrew it indicates a stutter, as in “I-I-I did not know it!” It is a stutter/exclamation of awe, of worship, of awareness of being on holy ground.

The Genesis reading invites us into that great story of Jacob’s dream at Bethel. It was believed in that time that oracles from God could be received by sleeping in a holy place. Jacob was wondering what the future held and in his dream he receives assurance that God will abide with him and his people, and that God had not abandoned them. There’s a promise to hold onto in 2021! The image of assurance is a compelling one: a “ladder” between heaven and earth, or better translated from the Hebrew, a “stairway” to heaven—see Led Zeppelin actually had it right.

An evening such as this, gathered in a magnificent place of worship to see and hear God’s people committing themselves to the way of Jesus, is a perfect time to be
reminded that God is always renewing God’s promise to us. Sure, many of us come tonight to receive the laying on of hands by the bishop to renew baptismal promises, but what carries the day is God’s promise to us. Our promises can be as fleeting as the wind, yes? We gather now and every time to re-member the truth that heaven and earth are forever linked. Jesus affirms Jacob’s Genesis vision when he says to Nathanael, “You will see heaven opened and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.” God’s promise to Jacob, indeed, God’s promise to you and to me, is fulfilled in Jesus.

As you move through this time of transition as a Diocese, perhaps wondering what the future may hold, know that every moment contains in it the God-possibility of renewal and promise. Our call now is to be a people, a Church, that looks and acts like Jesus. Tonight’s promise is that God is in this work of ministry with us. Heaven and earth are joined. Jacob saw it. Nathanael experienced it. I saw it in Calcutta. I see it in you. Even now, heaven and earth have come together in Jesus, and with the Angels, Archangels, and all the company of heaven, we worship. Do you see it?

Bishop Skip

 


 

De Génesis:  “Jacobo se despertó de su sueño y dijo: ‘¡Ciertamente el Señor está en este lugar, y yo no lo sabía!’ Y tenía miedo y dijo: ‘¡Qué increíble es este lugar! Esta no es otra que la casa de Dios, y esta es la puerta del cielo’”.

No solo aquí, sino cualquier lugar en el que nos encontremos, puede ser la puerta del cielo, un lugar donde nos abrimos a la posibilidad de reconocer la unión del cielo y la tierra. Permítanme contarles uno de los momentos de mi vida en el que Dios llegó a través del portal y dejó una huella indeleble en mi corazón y en mi alma.

En la década de 1990 tuve el privilegio de pasar algún tiempo trabajando con la Madre Teresa en Calcuta, India. Me asignaron al hogar de moribundos e indigentes, el “primer amor” de la Madre Teresa, como ella lo llamaba. Allí quiso que “nadie muriera sin saber que Dios le ama y sin conocer un toque humano de amor”. Había unas 100 camas. El 50% de la gente traída de las calles moriría allí. Los acogidos llegaron con lepra, tifus, tuberculosis, disentería, cólera, SIDA. Había que despiezarlos y, en algunos casos, eliminar el tejido gangrenoso. Se les puso ropa fresca que cubría las heridas de la calle.

Al entrar por la puerta el primer día descubrí que un hombre en la primera cuna había muerto minutos antes de mi llegada. Una monja se acercó a mí, me cogió la mano y me dijo: “Necesitamos que laves la ropa, las sábanas y las mantas”. Así que me llevaron a una habitación grande con cuatro bañeras de ladrillo en una línea cementada al suelo. Nos trajeron montones de ropa y ropa de cama, manchados por personas incontinentes. Cada bañera tenía un propósito: la primera revelaba a un lugareño que llevaba un palo largo y pesado para remover y aflojar lo que había en la tela; la segunda, mi bañera, era para verter desinfectante y fregar usando las paredes ásperas de los lados; la tercera contenía agua jabonosa para más lavado; la cuarta estaba allí para una esperada clara enjuague. Todo fue llevado al techo para esparcirlo al sol y secarlo.

Cuando me paré sobre mi estación en la segunda bañera, sobre todo en silencio, empecé a sentirme atraído por la presencia de Dios. Una puerta a unos metros detrás de mí tenía un cartel que decía: “Esta es la puerta del cielo”. Fue en la morgue. Mientras lavaba y fregaba, sintiendo ese dolor revelador en la espalda por estar inclinado, a veces pasaban cuerpos en una camilla.

Poco a poco, se produjo una transformación. Mientras miraba en el agua oscura y maloliente, vi el mundo. La ropa y las sábanas se convirtieron en sacramentos, signos visibles y exteriores del pueblo de Dios, vivo y muerto.  En esa agua sucia vi el dolor, las víctimas, la injusticia, la humillación, la degradación, la traición. Era el Gólgota, el lugar de la calavera, en una bañera. Entonces, y os aseguro que no soy una persona dada a oír cosas, de algún lugar aunque no lo pudiera localizar, ¡oí, ¡oí!, que se cantaban aleluyas. ¡El glorioso reino de Dios irrumpiendo!

Y continuó irrumpiendo cuando alcancé el lodo debajo de la superficie del agua. En mi bañera de desinfección sentí algo en la esquina de una manta que había sido doblada, una estrategia utilizada por los residentes para guardar para más tarde el arroz y el pan con el que se les había alimentado, temiendo que no se les proporcionara más. Esta vez, sin embargo, he sacado algo a la superficie. Rompiendo el menisco a la luz del día, en mi mano había un crucifijo de plástico barato de 25 centavos unido a las cuentas de un rosario. Estaba Cristo en la Cruz cuando una profunda sensación de paz me invadía al experimentar que el amor de Dios me abrazaba plena y completamente. Renovaba mis votos bautismales en el agua bendita manchada por el dolor y el dolor del pueblo de Dios.

“Seguramente el Señor está en este lugar y yo no lo sabía”. La semana pasada me enteré por nuestro Obispo Presidente que los eruditos judíos, al comentar la historia de Jacob en Betel, señalan que cuando Jacob dice, la palabra “yo”, en el hebreo indica un tartamudeo, como en “¡no lo sabía!”. Es una tartamudez o exclamación de asombro, de adoración, de conciencia de estar en tierra santa.

La lectura del Génesis nos invita a entrar en esa gran historia del sueño de Jacob en Betel.  En ese tiempo se creía que los oráculos de Dios podían ser recibidos durmiendo en un lugar sagrado. Jacob se preguntaba qué le deparaba el futuro y en su sueño recibe la seguridad de que Dios permanecerá con él y con su pueblo, y que Dios no los había abandonado. ¡Hay una promesa a la que aferrarse en 2021! La imagen de la seguridad es convincente: una “escalera” entre el cielo y la tierra, o mejor traducido del hebreo, una “escalera” hacia el cielo; en realidad Led Zeppelin lo tenía claro.

Una velada como esta, reunida en un magnífico lugar de culto para ver y escuchar al pueblo de Dios comprometerse con el camino de Jesús, es el momento perfecto para recordar que Dios siempre está renovando la promesa de Dios para nosotros. Ciertamente, muchos de nosotros venimos esta noche a recibir la imposición de manos del obispo para renovar las promesas bautismales, pero lo que lleva el día es la promesa de Dios para nosotros. Nuestras promesas pueden ser tan fugaces como el viento, ¿sí? Nos reunimos ahora y cada vez para recordar la verdad de que el cielo y la tierra están unidos para siempre. Jesús afirma la visión del Génesis de Jacob cuando le dice a Natanael: “Verás el cielo abierto y a los ángeles de Dios subiendo y bajando sobre el Hijo del Hombre.”  La promesa de Dios a Jacob, de hecho, la promesa de Dios para ti y para mí, se cumple en Jesús.

Al pasar por este tiempo de transición como diócesis, quizá preguntándote qué depara el futuro, sepa que cada momento contiene en él la posibilidad de renovación y promesa de Dios. Nuestro llamamiento ahora es ser un pueblo, una Iglesia, que se parezca y actúe como Jesús. La promesa de esta noche es que Dios está en esta obra de ministerio con nosotros. El cielo y la tierra están unidos. Jacob lo vio. Nathanael lo experimentó. Lo vi en Calcuta. Lo veo en ti. Incluso ahora, el cielo y la tierra se han unido en Jesús, y con los ángeles, los arcángeles y toda la compañía del cielo, adoramos. ¿Lo ves?

 

Feast Days with Bishop Skip | St. Matthew the Apostle

We remember and celebrate this day the call of Matthew by Jesus. In Matthew 9:9 we read, “Jesus saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector’s booth.”  Perhaps the most startling words in the entire account are those that indicate Jesus “saw him.”

Are we appropriately surprised by the unlikelihood of this call? It would have been easy for Jesus not to see Matthew.  It would have been more efficient to walk on by and not bother.  After all Matthew was a tax collector: a collaborator with the Roman government and understood as an extortionist who was getting rich off of his own people.  Furthermore, we know that tax collectors were abhorred by the most pious of Jewish groups, the Pharisees.  Yet, Jesus did see Matthew and dared to call him into his circle of disciples in order that he might follow.

Whom do we not see?  For whom would it be easy to walk on by, not recognize or acknowledge?  Whom do we choose not to value?  Often when disasters strike such as in pandemics, hurricanes, or even in our difficult national conversations regarding displacement and immigration, it is precisely those who are the unseen that are suddenly exposed. This is especially true of the poor and other vulnerable populations.  It is my hope that in our faith communities we are working very hard to see as clearly as Jesus sees, and draw into his circle of care those to whom we need to respond, in word and in action.  

As Matthew 9:13 reminds us, quoting Hosea, “I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” The law of love takes precedence even over our desire for personal freedom. Our religious devotion and our life as a Church mean little to nothing unless we are willing to love as Jesus loves, with mercy, as we respect the dignity of every human being and create a world where hope is born. 

Bishop Skip

 

________________________________________

 

Recordamos y celebramos este día el llamado de Mateo por Jesús. En Mateo 9:9 leemos: “Jesús vio a un hombre llamado Mateo sentado en el puesto de los recaudadores de impuestos”.  Quizá las palabras más sorprendentes de todo el relato son las que indican que Jesús “lo vio”.

¿Nos sorprende apropiadamente la improbabilidad de esta llamada? Hubiera sido fácil para Jesús no ver a Mateo.  Hubiera sido más eficiente caminar y no molestarse.  Al fin y al cabo Mateo era un recaudador de impuestos: un colaborador del gobierno romano y  un extorsionador que se enriquecía a costa de su propio pueblo.  Además, sabemos que los grupos judíos más piadosos, los fariseos, aborrecieron a los recaudadores de impuestos.  Sin embargo, Jesús vio a Mateo y se atrevió a llamarlo a su círculo de discípulos para que pudiera seguirlo.

¿A quién no vemos?  ¿Para quién sería fácil pasar de largo, no reconocer ni reconocer?  ¿A quién elegimos no valorar?  A menudo, cuando se producen catástrofes como pandemias, huracanes o incluso en nuestras difíciles conversaciones nacionales sobre desplazamientos e inmigración, son precisamente los que no se ven los que quedan repentinamente expuestos. Esto resulta especialmente cierto en el caso de los pobres y otras poblaciones vulnerables.  Espero que en nuestras comunidades de fe estemos trabajando muy duro para ver tan claramente como Jesús ve y atraer a su círculo de atención a aquellos a quienes tenemos que responder, de palabra y de acción.  

Como nos recuerda Mateo 9:13, citando a Oseas: “Misericordia quiero, no sacrificios”. La ley del amor prevalece incluso sobre nuestro deseo de libertad personal. Nuestra devoción religiosa y nuestra vida como Iglesia significan poco o nada si no estamos dispuestos a amar como ama Jesús, con misericordia, respetando la dignidad de cada ser humano y creando un mundo donde nazca la esperanza. 

Obispo Skip

FEAST DAYS WITH BISHOP SKIP | SAINT BARTHOLOMEW THE APOSTLE

He is on the list of twelve. Not much more can be said about Bartholomew. Three of the Gospels and the book of Acts mention him as one of the apostles, but beyond that we know almost nothing. Interesting conjecture poses the possibility that Bartholomew and Nathanael were the same person. There are other traditions that arose over the years that cannot be proven. Even the word “patronymic” comes up – do look it up. So what do we do with this known yet unknown figure?

Perhaps by not knowing details we are free to play. In contrast to similar stories in Mark and Matthew of friction amongst the disciples over authority and who will get the best seat, the context of Luke 22 is a time of transition from Jesus’ impending death and his expectations of faithful leadership in the continuation of the ministry he initiated. We can then apply to this day Luke’s perspective in his Gospel of the call of Jesus for the disciples and therefore the call of all who will follow through the millennia.

Too often in the Church we get hung up in institutional minutia. The preservation of buildings and other infrastructure tend to become the main thing and have us focus on survival as we take our eye off of the reason we exist. Notice that Jesus is not preparing the way for institutional preservation. In this last will and testament, he is saying to the disciples and therefore to us that the kingdom for which he is preparing is one for which we must be preparing. We do so by living in a manner that creates the greatest possibility for it to break in and break through: “I assign to you, as my Father has assigned to me, a kingdom…” (Luke 22:29).

Jesus has shown in his life and death the very essence of whom God is. The only reason for the Church to exist, and I would add the only reason for a Christian faith community to exist, is so that through our worship of God we might find the reality of the reign of God taking shape in the lives of the people who gather, in the Church we love, and then in our mission whereby we seek to establish God’s reign of peace and justice in the world. A bishop friend says very clearly that the Church does not have a mission. God has a mission and a Church through which to carry out that mission. He does, I believe, have a point. Our purpose is God’s mission as presented by Jesus.

Today’s celebration of the person of Bartholomew, in his historical role and witness, calls us once again to ask the question of ourselves and of the faith communities of which we are a part – why do we exist? What is our purpose of being? Along the way, may we find that we, in the words of the collect for the day, ”…love what he believed and preach what he taught.”

Bishop Skip

 

__________________________________________________________________________

Él está en la lista de los doce.  No se puede decir mucho más sobre Bartolomé.  Tres de los Evangelios y el libro de Hechos lo mencionan como uno de los apóstoles, pero más allá de eso no sabemos casi nada.  Una conjetura interesante plantea la posibilidad de que Bartolomé y Natanael fueran la misma persona. Hay otras tradiciones que surgieron a lo largo de los años que no se pueden probar.  Incluso aparece la palabra “patronímico”, búsquelo.  Entonces, ¿qué hacemos con esta figura conocida pero desconocida?

Quizá al no conocer los detalles se nos da la libertad de jugar.  A diferencia de los relatos similares de Marcos y Mateo sobre las fricciones entre los discípulos en torno a la autoridad y a quién le tocará el mejor asiento, el contexto de Lucas 22 es un momento de transición de la muerte inminente de Jesús y sus expectativas de liderazgo fiel en la continuación del ministerio que inició.  Podemos entonces aplicar a este día la perspectiva de Lucas en su Evangelio de la llamada de Jesús para los discípulos y por lo tanto la llamada de todos los que seguirán a través de los milenios.

Con demasiada frecuencia, en la Iglesia nos obsesionamos con las minucias institucionales. La preservación de los edificios y otras infraestructuras tiende a convertirse en lo principal y nos hace centrarnos en la supervivencia mientras apartamos la vista de la razón por la que existimos.  Nótese que Jesús no está preparando el camino para la preservación institucional.  En esta última voluntad y testamento, le está diciendo a los discípulos y, por tanto, a nosotros, que el reino para el que se está preparando es uno para el que nosotros debemos prepararnos.  Lo hacemos viviendo de una forma que crea la mayor posibilidad de entrar y abrirse paso:  “Os asigno, como mi Padre me ha asignado, un reino…” (Lucas 22:29).  

Jesús ha mostrado en su vida y muerte la esencia misma de quién es Dios.  La única razón de ser de la Iglesia, y yo añadiría la única razón de ser de una comunidad de fe cristiana, es que a través de nuestro culto a Dios podamos encontrar la realidad del reino de Dios tomando forma en las vidas de las personas que se reúnen, en la Iglesia que amamos, y luego en nuestra misión por la que buscamos establecer el reino de Dios de paz y justicia en el mundo.  Un amigo obispo dice muy claramente que la Iglesia no tiene una misión.  Dios tiene una misión y una Iglesia a través de la cual llevar a cabo esa misión.  Y creo que tiene razón.  Nuestro propósito es la misión de Dios tal como la presenta Jesús.  

La celebración de hoy de la persona de Bartolomé, en su papel histórico y su testimonio, nos llama una vez más a preguntarnos y a las comunidades de fe de las que formamos parte: ¿por qué existimos?  ¿Cuál es nuestro propósito de ser?  A lo largo del camino, que encontremos que, en palabras de la colecta del día, “…amamos lo que él creía y predicamos lo que él enseñaba”.

Obispo Skip

Feast Days with Bishop Skip | The Transfiguration

Note that the event of Jesus’ transfiguration begins with him in prayer.  How could it be any other way?  The whole experience in Luke’s account is bracketed by Jesus pointing toward the way of the cross and his eventual death.  He enters into prayer as he offers himself to a centered conversation with God whereby he might gain clarity about his mission on earth.  Jesus’ “departure,” or even better, “exodus,” which he is to accomplish at Jerusalem, signifies his unique role in salvation history.  The way of Jesus, the way of giving oneself away as an offering of love and in thanksgiving for the gift of life, is the way for all.

The Transfiguration gives us a window through which we are able to catch a glimpse of Jesus’ identity continuing in the fullness of the Law and the Prophets as known through Moses and Elijah.  We are also given a view, as the veil is pulled back a bit, of the purpose of all humanity.  There are gifted moments in life when we are able to see most clearly, unitive experiences if you will, when we know to the very depths of our being why we are here, for what we were created, and that in our human experience we know ourselves held by a love that knows no bounds.

I had such an experience in a systematic theology class when my professor shared with us a particularly sacred and tender moment in his life.  While out to dinner with his wife, he got a phone call to return home immediately where a baby sitter had been caring for his young child.  They learned that in a horrific accident in the home and through no fault of the baby sitter, their beloved child had died.  These words from my professor were indelibly marked on my soul that day when he said, “I have been to the bottom and the bottom is firm.”  It is firm because of the One who holds us and just as with Jesus, calls us beloved.

It is something of the quality of that awareness that Jesus knew on the holy mount.  He was completely and transparently in that moment so drawn by grace into the fullness of his humanity that his divinity could not help but become evident as well.  This is why in the end, in Christian understanding, there is really only one sacrament—Jesus the Christ.  He is the outward and visible sign of the inward and spiritual grace of God.  Any other sacramental expression is only so to the degree that it manifests Christ himself and as it draws us to the place where we know our own Christ-likeness.

One of my spiritual practices is to look for how a person has been a sacrament in his or her life, a window through which we catch a glimpse of the beauty of God and that to which Jesus points.  This often plays out when I am reflecting on a life in preparation to preach at a funeral.  A dear friend died recently.  When pondering his gift to me, I realized that in his presence and his own broken humanity, I always knew I was loved.  In this way he portrayed Christ to me—no question.  This is God’s gift to Jesus in his transfiguration.  It is God’s gift to us in Christ.  It is to be our gift to the world.

 


 

Tenga en cuenta que el acontecimiento de la transfiguración de Jesús comienza con él en oración.  ¿Cómo podría ser de otro modo?  En el relato de Lucas, toda la experiencia está marcada por el hecho de que Jesús señala el camino de la cruz y su eventual muerte.  Entra en la oración ofreciéndose a una conversación centrada con Dios para obtener claridad sobre su misión en la tierra.  La “partida”, o mejor aún, el “éxodo” de Jesús, que va realizará en Jerusalén, significa su papel único en la historia de la salvación.  El camino de Jesús, la forma de entregarse como ofrenda de amor y en acción de gracias por el don de la vida, es el camino para todos.


La Transfiguración nos ofrece una ventana a través de la cual podemos vislumbrar que la identidad de Jesús continúa en la plenitud de la Ley y los Profetas, tal como se conoce a través de Moisés y Elías.  También se nos da una visión, a medida que el velo se retira un poco hacia atrás, del propósito de toda la humanidad.  Hay momentos dotados en la vida en los que somos capaces de ver con mayor claridad, experiencias unitivas si se quiere, cuando sabemos hasta lo más profundo de nuestro ser por qué estamos aquí, para qué fuimos creados, y que en nuestra experiencia humana nos sabemos sostenidos por un amor que no conoce límites.


Tuve esa experiencia en una clase de teología sistemática cuando mi profesor compartió con nosotros un momento particularmente sagrado y tierno de su vida.  Mientras salía a cenar con su mujer, recibió una llamada telefónica para que volviera inmediatamente a casa, donde una niñera había estado cuidando de su hijo pequeño.  Se enteraron de que en un horrible accidente en el hogar y sin culpa de la niñera, su querido hijo había muerto.  Estas palabras de mi profesor quedaron marcadas de forma indeleble en mi alma aquel día cuando dijo: “He estado en el fondo y el fondo es firme”.  Es firme debido a Aquel que nos sostiene y, al igual que con Jesús, nos llama amados.


Es algo de la calidad de esa conciencia que Jesús conocía en el monte sagrado.  En ese momento, la gracia lo atrajo de tal forma a la plenitud de su humanidad que su divinidad no pudo evitar hacerse también evidente.  Por eso, al final, en el entendimiento cristiano, solo hay un sacramento: Jesucristo.  Es el signo exterior y visible de la gracia interior y espiritual de Dios.  Cualquier otra expresión sacramental es solo así en la medida en que manifiesta a Cristo mismo y nos lleva al lugar donde conocemos nuestra propia semejanza a Cristo.


Una de mis prácticas espirituales es buscar cómo una persona ha sido un sacramento en su vida, una ventana a través de la cual vislumbramos la belleza de Dios y aquello a lo que Jesús apunta.  Esto ocurre a menudo cuando reflexiono sobre una vida en preparación para predicar en un funeral.  Un querido amigo murió hace poco.  Al reflexionar sobre el regalo que me hizo, me di cuenta que en su presencia y en su propia humanidad rota, siempre supe que era amado.  De esta manera me retrató a Cristo, sin duda.  Este es el regalo de Dios a Jesús en su transfiguración.  Es el regalo de Dios para nosotros en Cristo.  Es nuestro regalo para el mundo.

FEAST DAYS WITH BISHOP SKIP | SAINT JAMES THE APOSTLE

I am intrigued by the juxtaposition of the readings from Matthew and Acts for this day.  It is in Matthew that we hear of the desire of the mother of James and John – and I am guessing she is speaking her sons’ desire too – that they be given places of honor next to Jesus.  In the book of Acts we learn that James is martyred at the hands of Roman power exercised through the person of Herod Agrippa.  So James did indeed drink of the cup from which Jesus drank, but certainly it was not for what he or his mother was asking.

Ambition within a community, even a community gathered around Christ, is not unknown, but it is not Jesus’ way.  He models a leadership style of the self-offering of the servant which ushers in true freedom.  In the Collect for Peace from the Daily Office we pray, “…to serve you is perfect freedom.”  This freedom which comes from being bound to service to another is a paradox.  It is not unlike a kite, which when tethered to a string is able to live fully into its “kiteness,” that is, to be truly free to fulfill its purpose to fly and drift with the wind.  If one was to cut the string, in a misguided attempt to set it free, it would come crashing to the ground and no longer do what it was created to do.  Oddly, human beings often mistake the way of destruction for freedom, such as in the refusal to wear masks.

Obedience is not a popular concept in today’s world.  Yet, when we make baptismal promises, or take vows in ordination, we are making promises of obedience not because it restricts our freedom, but because in giving ourselves to these promises we are set free to be and become who God has created us to be.  The ordained deacon is called to be the icon of such obedient service, thereby calling all of the baptized to this vision of faithful living.  Baptism is, if you will, our expulsion from slavery in Egypt, an old way of life that destroys and diminishes, into the exodus of moving with and toward God.  All along we are invited to feed on the manna of Eucharist freely given, indeed to drink the cup Jesus drank in our desert journey leading us home.

Part of what we celebrate in the person of James the Apostle is his grounding in service to Christ that moved beyond the desire for power to the deeper place of servant.  It set him free to where he could offer even his life in joyful service to God and God’s people.  Christ offers this freedom to us all.

 

Bishop Skip


Me intriga la yuxtaposición de las lecturas de Mateo y Hechos para este día.  Es en Mateo donde oímos el deseo de la madre de Santiago y Juan -y supongo que ella también habla del deseo de sus hijos- que se les den lugares de honor junto a Jesús.  En el libro de Hechos aprendemos que Santiago es martirizado a manos del poder romano ejercido por medio de la persona de Herodes Agripa.  Así que James bebió de la copa de la que Jesús bebía, pero ciertamente no fue por lo que él o su madre estaban pidiendo.

La ambición dentro de una comunidad, incluso una comunidad reunida en torno a Cristo, no es desconocida, pero no es el camino de Jesús.  Él modela un estilo de liderazgo de la autooferta del sirviente que marca el comienzo de la verdadera libertad.  En la Colecta por la Paz del Oficio Diario rezamos: “…servirte es la perfecta libertad”.  Esta libertad que viene de estar obligado a servir a otro es una paradoja.  No es diferente de una cometa, que cuando está atada a una cuerda es capaz de vivir plenamente, es decir, de ser verdaderamente libre para cumplir su propósito de volar y derivar con el viento.  Si uno cortara la cuerda, en un intento equivocado de liberarla, se estrellaría contra el suelo y ya no haría lo que se creó para hacer.  Curiosamente, los seres humanos a menudo confunden la forma de destrucción con la libertad, como en la negativa a usar cubre bocas.

La obediencia no es un concepto popular en el mundo actual.  Sin embargo, cuando hacemos promesas bautismales, o hacemos votos en la ordenación, estamos haciendo promesas de obediencia no porque restrinja nuestra libertad, sino porque al entregarnos a estas promesas somos liberados para ser y llegar a ser lo que Dios ha creado que seamos.  El diácono ordenado está llamado a ser el icono de ese servicio obediente, llamando así a todos los bautizados a esta visión de vida fiel.  El bautismo es, si se quiere, nuestra expulsión de la esclavitud en Egipto, un viejo modo de vida que destruye y disminuye, hacia el éxodo de moverse con y hacia Dios.  En todo momento se nos invita a alimentarnos del maná de la Eucaristía que se nos da gratuitamente, es más, a beber el cáliz que Jesús bebió en nuestro viaje por el desierto que nos lleva a casa.

Parte de lo que celebramos en la persona de Santiago Apóstol es su arraigo en el servicio a Cristo, que fue más allá del deseo de poder, hacia el lugar más profundo de siervo.  Lo liberó hasta donde podía ofrecer incluso su vida en servicio alegre a Dios y al pueblo de Dios.  Cristo nos ofrece esta libertad a todos.

Feast Days with Bishop Skip | Mary Magdalene

When one reads the scriptural record of this woman of faith, the negative ascriptions given to her over the centuries are quite astonishing, even puzzling.  One wonders if there is not some kind of latent sexism at play here.

First, there is the common misconception that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute.  Nothing in the Bible indicates that this was so.  The city of Magdala was an important shipbuilding and trade center in its day and history indicates it had an unsavory reputation.  Guilt by association does not necessarily apply, however.

Then there is the word “maudlin,” which is an alteration of the word “Magdalene,” from the practice of depicting her as a weeping, penitent sinner.  Well yes, John’s Gospel does indicate that she wept at Jesus’ tomb when his body was found to be missing, a perfectly appropriate grief reaction to my mind.  She also was healed by Jesus of some kind of spiritual and/or physical illness.  But the definition of maudlin as “weakly and effusively sentimental” is a completely unfair characterization when it comes to Mary.  Her story would indicate quite the opposite.

Mary Magdalene travelled with Jesus and supported the mission financially.  She went with others to Jesus’ tomb to anoint his body and in John’s account, was the first witness to the resurrection.  The Eastern Church regards her as the equal of an apostle.  Even more stunningly, it was Mary Magdalene who was present at the crucifixion after all of the other disciples had abandoned Jesus to save their own hide.   I understand why the disciples ran.  My point is that Mary of Magdala did not run, but chose to stay at the risk of her life.  Her devotion to Jesus is unquestionable.  After the resurrection the disciples went back home, but Mary “…wept and remained standing outside the tomb.”

What are we afraid of here—intimacy?  Is it that the man Jesus seems to have had a close, loving relationship with an empowered woman as a disciple and it makes us nervous?  Whatever the source of anxiety may be in the historical record surrounding her, it is important that we see in Mary Magdalene a person of strength who never stops her seeking of the Christ in his life or in his death.  Gregory the Great said that, “She longed for him whom she thought had been taken away.  And so it happened that the woman who stayed behind to seek Christ was the only one to see him.”

We tend to find what we are looking for, positively and negatively.  Mary was looking for Jesus and in her seeking, heard her name called by the Savior of the world.  Who was seeking whom?  It is in our seeking that we are found.


Cuando uno lee el registro bíblico de esta mujer de fe, las ascripciones negativas que se le han dado a lo largo de los siglos son bastante asombrosas, incluso desconcertantes.  De hecho, uno se pregunta si no hay algún tipo de sexismo latente en juego.

En primer lugar, existe la idea errónea de que María Magdalena era una prostituta.  Nada de la Biblia indica que esto fuera así.  La ciudad de Magdala era un importante centro comercial y de construcción naval en su época y la historia indica que tenía una reputación desagradable.  Sin embargo, la culpa por asociación no se aplica necesariamente.

Luego está la palabra “sensiblera”, que es una alteración de la palabra “Magdalena”, por la práctica de representarla como una pecadora llorona y penitente.  Pues sí, el Evangelio de Juan indica que lloró ante la tumba de Jesús cuando se descubrió que su cuerpo había desaparecido, una reacción de dolor perfectamente apropiada a mi entender.  También fue sanada por Jesús de algún tipo de enfermedad espiritual y/o física.  Pero la definición de sensiblero como “débil y efusivamente sentimental” es una caracterización completamente injusta cuando se trata de María.  Su historia indicaría todo lo contrario.

María Magdalena viajó con Jesús y apoyó la misión financieramente.  Ella fue con otros a la tumba de Jesús para ungir su cuerpo y, en el relato de Juan, fue el primer testigo de la resurrección.  La Iglesia Oriental la considera igual de apóstol.  Aún más sorprendente, fue María Magdalena quien estuvo presente en la crucifixión después de que todos los demás discípulos abandonaron a Jesús para salvar su propio pellejo.   Entiendo por qué huyeron los discípulos.  Lo que quiero decir es que María de Magdala no huyó, sino que eligió quedarse a riesgo de su vida.  Su devoción a Jesús es incuestionable.  Después de la resurrección los discípulos volvieron a casa, pero María “…lloró y se quedó de pie fuera del sepulcro”.

¿De qué tenemos miedo aquí, de la intimidad?  ¿Acaso es que el hombre Jesús parece haber tenido una relación estrecha y amorosa con una mujer empoderada como discípula y eso nos pone nerviosos?  Cualquiera que sea la fuente de ansiedad en el registro histórico que la rodea, es importante que veamos en María Magdalena a una persona de fuerza que nunca deja de buscar a Cristo en su vida o en su muerte.  Gregorio Magno dijo que: “Ella anhelaba a quien creía arrebatado.  Y así sucedió que la mujer que se quedó buscando a Cristo fue la única que lo vio”.

Tendemos a encontrar lo que buscamos, positiva y negativamente.  María estaba buscando a Jesús y, en su búsqueda, escuchó su nombre llamado por el Salvador del mundo.  ¿Quién buscaba a quién?  Nos encontramos en nuestra búsqueda.

A Word from Bishop Hougland | Goodbye and a Blessing

 

The Rt. Rev. Whayne Hougland, now former bishop provisional of Eastern and bishop diocesan of Western Michigan, offers the dioceses a word as he departs, blessing us on our way. 


Hi, my friends in Eastern and Western Michigan, it’s Whayne Hougland here. As you know, a week ago I resigned as your Bishop. It was not a decision that was made easily or lightly, but, was done prayerfully and intentionally after a lot of discernment.

Some things I wanted to say as I leave you — first of all, I just am terribly sorry for what has transpired in the last year — for my bad choice that led to my suspension, and to the hardship and difficulty and disappointment that many of you have experienced because of that in the last year. That will be a burden I will carry with me for the rest of my life and I am truly sorry.  It was my choice, it was a bad choice, and I apologize.

I also wanted to say a deep thank you to you for your continued support in this last year to Dana and me and our family. I have been working for this last year to get back to you, but it didn’t seem to work out. I just want you to know how much I appreciate the support you’ve given particularly Dana, she is doing really well and we’re working really really hard on our marriage and on ourselves. We’re both in really good physical shape and we’ve been working with therapists on a weekly basis and working together. We’re taking it one step at a time, day-by-day. Just like any relationship would — it’s just day-by-day, one step at a time. There have been some difficult times, but we’re working our way through it.

I also wanted to tell you we’re now living in Indianapolis, we’ve actually been here since August of last year, close to our daughter Erin and her husband Isaac, and our grandsons Ian and Sam. We live just about a 10-minute walk from them. We’ll be staying here in Indianapolis and trying to continue our lives moving forward from here. Leah and River and Evan will continue living in Grand Rapids where they’ve made a home and are quite happy. This gives us reasonable proximity to them and also to both sets of our parents who are in Lexington, Kentucky, just a few hours down the road.

Just some things I wanted to say before I leave… If there’s anything prophetic that I have to say, it’s that you must know is that you are absolutely, each one of you, beautiful gems of creation. There ain’t gonna be another one like you ever in the history of the world. You are fabulous and wonderful just as you are, and I hope that you can believe that, I believe that, I’m trying to believe that for myself.

I also wanted to share with you one last time some words from John McQuiston from his book, “Always We Begin Again,” —  he’s talking about Paramount goals.

“What is wanted is not that we should find ultimate truth nor that we should become secure, nor that we should have ease, nor that we should be without hurt, but that we should live fully. Therefore, we should not fear life nor anything in life. We should not fear death nor anything in death. We should live our lives in love with life. And so it is for us to train our hearts to live in Grace, to sacrifice ourselves and our desires, to find the peace without want, without seeking it for ourselves, and when we fail, to begin again each day.”

That’s certainly what I’m trying to do. I want you to know that I love you guys, I miss you guys, and I wish you nothing but the best as you move forward.

And as I leave, remember that life is short, and we do not have much time to gladden the hearts of those who travel this way with us. So, be swift to love and make haste to be kind. In the blessing of God all mighty, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, be with you now and always. Amen. Be well, everyone.

Feast Days with Bishop Skip | Independence Day

The observance of this day on the Church’s calendar was born out of differences of perspective.  Although lessons and prayers were appointed for a national observance in the Proposed Prayer Book of 1786, they were deleted by the General Convention of 1789 in deference to the majority of the clergy who had remained loyal to the British crown.  Not until the revision of the Book of Common Prayer in 1928 was it restored.

For me a tension continues.  I must confess that any time the life of prayer, worship and Scripture are aligned too closely with national desire I get nervous.  I find that renditions of the flag of the United States printed on a page leaf in the front of a Bible especially troublesome.  Such approaches too often cross the line into nationalism, an idolatry that blurs the distinction of the sovereignty of God and national purpose as if one is equal to the other.  Deuteronomy 10:20 appointed for today says, “…him alone shall you worship.”  Failure to be clear about this is pointed to through the work of “The Southern Poverty Law Center.”  The alarming proliferation of extremist nationalist groups in the United States quoting the Bible and spewing racist, misogynist and intolerant hatred is well documented.

Please do not misunderstand.  I am a patriot and am grateful that I am a citizen of the United States.  When I get to travel I thank service men and women for their offering when I see them in airports.  At the same time, I am very clear that the United States enjoys no favored position with God compared to any other country, people or tribe.  The Collect for the Day asks of God that we “may have grace to maintain our liberties in righteousness and peace.”  There is a proper place for grateful hearts for the sacrifices made to secure our land from tyranny and oppression, as long as we also are willing to repent of the times when we have participated in or remained silent for similar sin.

When at our best, we have been an example of liberty to many over the last 245 years.  We are still working on living into what we say are our ideals as a country, calling us to be open-hearted enough to be able to hear faithful and prophetic critique when what we do as a nation is in conflict with the Gospel.  As disciples of Christ and yet citizens of a nation, what does loving our enemies (Matthew 5:44) and loving the stranger in our midst (Deuteronomy 10:19) look like in national policy?  These are not small questions.  I was present for a poignant moment some years ago when the United States was pondering going to war with Iraq.  A bishop from another part of the Anglican Communion said, “I hope for the day that the words ‘God bless America’ are a prayer rather than a war cry.”  May we be blessed, not for the gain of special status, but in order to be a blessing for the world.

 

 

La celebración de este día en el calendario de la Iglesia nació de las diferencias en cuanto a perspectiva.  Aunque las lecciones y oraciones fueron designadas para celebrarse a nivel nacional en el libro de oraciones propuesto de 1786, la Convención General de 1789 las eliminó en deferencia a la mayoría del clero que se había mantenido leal a la corona británica.  No se restauró hasta que la revisión del Libro de Oración Común en 1928.

Sin embargo, para mí persiste una tensión.  Debo confesar que cada vez que la vida de oración, el culto y las Escrituras se alinean demasiado con el deseo nacional me pongo nervioso.  Me molestan especialmente las representaciones de la bandera de los Estados Unidos impresas en una hoja de la portada de una Biblia.  Estos enfoques cruzan con demasiada frecuencia la línea del nacionalismo, una idolatría que difumina la distinción de la soberanía de Dios y el propósito nacional como si uno fuera igual al otro.  Deuteronomio 10:20 señalado para hoy dice: “…sólo a él adorarás”.  La falta de claridad al respecto nos lleva al trabajo de “The Southern Poverty Law Center”.  La alarmante proliferación de grupos nacionalistas extremistas en los Estados Unidos que citan la Biblia y expresan odio racista, misógino e intolerante está bien documentada.

Por favor, no me malinterpreten.  Soy un patriota y estoy agradecido de ser ciudadano de los Estados Unidos.  Cuando llego a viajar agradezco a los hombres y mujeres por su servicio cuando los veo en aeropuertos.  Al mismo tiempo, tengo muy claro que los Estados Unidos no goza de ninguna posición favorecida con Dios en comparación con ningún otro país, pueblo o tribu.  La colecta del día pide a Dios que “tengamos la gracia de mantener nuestras libertades en la justicia y la paz”.  Hay un lugar apropiado para los corazones agradecidos por los sacrificios hechos para asegurar nuestra tierra de la tiranía y la opresión, siempre y cuando también estemos dispuestos a arrepentirnos de las veces que hemos participado o permanecido en silencio por un pecado similar.

Cuando estamos en nuestro mejor momento, hemos sido un ejemplo de libertad para muchos en los últimos 245 años.  Seguimos trabajando para vivir lo que decimos que son nuestros ideales como país, lo que nos llama a ser lo suficientemente abiertos de corazón como para poder escuchar la crítica fiel y profética cuando lo que hacemos como nación está en conflicto con el Evangelio.  Como discípulos de Cristo y ciudadanos de una nación, ¿qué aspecto tiene amar a nuestros enemigos (Mateo 5:44) y amar al extraño en medio de nosotros (Deuteronomio 10:19) en la política nacional?  No se trata de preguntas pequeñas.  Estuve presente durante un momento conmovedor hace algunos años cuando Estados Unidos estaba reflexionando sobre la guerra contra Irak.  Un obispo de otra parte de la Comunión Anglicana dijo: “Espero que llegue el día en que las palabras “Dios bendiga a Estados Unidos” sean una oración y no un grito de guerra”.  Que seamos bendecidos, no para ganar un estatus especial, sino para ser una bendición para el mundo.

Obispo Skip